PDF] Performance Comparison of the AES Submissions
Por um escritor misterioso
Last updated 20 setembro 2024
This paper compares the performance of the leading AES candidates on a variety of common platforms: 32-bit CPUs, 64- bit CPUs, cheap 8-bit smart-card CPUs, and dedicated hardware. The principal goal guiding the design of any encryption algorithm must be security. In the real world, however, performance and implementation cost are always of concern. Making the assumption that the major AES candidates are secure (a big assumption, to be sure, but one that is best dealt with in another paper), the most important properties the algorithms will be judged on will be the performance and cost of implementation. In this paper, we will completely ignore security. Instead, we will compare the performance of the leading AES candidates on a variety of common platforms: 32-bit CPUs, 64-bit CPUs, cheap 8-bit smart-card CPUs, and dedicated hardware. For each platform, we first make some general observations on the performance issues for each of the platforms, then compare the various AES candidates, and finally look at the specific issues for each of the candidates.
Performance analysis of AES, DES and Blowfish cryptographic
AES Publishes AES75-2023: AES Standard for Acoustics Update
Guidance on the Indicator Tracking Table
PDF) Performance Comparison of the AES Submissions
Security and Performance of Homomorphic Encryption - Global
Electronics, Free Full-Text
3.5 Task 5: Performance Comparison: RSA versus AES [8
Applied Sciences, Free Full-Text
GROMACS and LUMI Supercomputer Transform Molecular Dynamics
Performance Analysis of Enhanced AES-128 and Blowfish Algorithms
Recomendado para você
você pode gostar