Why McDonald's, Starbucks and other American brands continue to pay the price of politics in the Middle East
Por um escritor misterioso
Last updated 12 novembro 2024
RIYADH: Whenever conflicts erupt in the Middle East, American consumer brands are often among the first targets of public anger. The war in Gaza has been no different, with McDonald’s and Starbucks branches in Lebanon attacked and consumer boycotts announced throughout the region. These attacks and boycotts echo similar scenes from the time of the Second Intifada in the early 2000s and the Iraq War era, which prompted a ban on Coca-Cola that remained in place in many Arab countries for decades, giving its rival Pepsi a market advantage enjoyed to this day.
Companies from Starbucks to McDonald's face controversy amid
Israel-Hamas War Leads to Boycotts of Multinational Brands
Why McDonald's, Starbucks and other American brands continue to
McDonald's testing new CosMc's chain
McDonald's
Why McDonald's, Starbucks and other American brands continue to
McDonald's, Starbucks to Close Russian Locations - WSJ
Restaurants, Food Companies Pursue Budget-Minded Consumers as
Starbucks and McDonald's maintain dominance as the world's most
sbux3974881-def14ax2x1.jpg
Ranked: The Most Popular Fast Food Brands in America
McDonald's, PepsiCo, GM Flex Their Pricing Power - WSJ
Does anyone know why McDonald's and Starbucks are not affected : r
Recomendado para você
você pode gostar